2 Comments

This 3 Days to Kill review is not a man’s color

3 Days to Kill review

Plot

I wanted to like this, but it turned out to be a Die Hard clone that tried to be too funny at times. Also, the more interesting of the two stories got pushed so far aside that I thought they had forgotten it.

Characters

Why was the main (non-daughter) female character giving off such an evil vibe the whole time? It felt like Kevin Costner’s character was interchangable with several Tom Cruise or Bruce Willis roles.

Visuals

I get the point of the disorienting effects, but sometimes it felt like they went too far with it. Or I’m too queasy.

That’s right. This movie got a point deduction for my personal problems.

Product Placement

Some people might say something about the cars, but they’re covered under my “they gotta drive something” rule.

Rewatchability

Not much more than a forgettable action movie, but it’s okay if you have…time to kill.

Find out more!  Don't miss tomorrow's review!

2 comments on “This 3 Days to Kill review is not a man’s color

  1. I think they just gave him three days to kill the Wolf guy because they needed a title. The stakes didn’t feel very high, because I love how these guys are said to be terrorists, but it looks like they’re just on the run. Or something? Yeah, I have to agree about Amber Heard – she just looked so dark and by the vibe she was giving, especially in the trailer, I thought she was going to be the villain! I just finished my review and I say “one probably won’t be able to tell if she’s a good girl or a bad girl.” Does that sound sexual the way one would read it in their head? LOL

Today You Left a Comment

%d bloggers like this: